Free Content Influence of a lipase inhibitor on gastric sensitivity and accommodation to an orally ingested meal

Authors: Demarchi, B.1; Vos, R.1; Deprez, P.2; Janssens, J.1; Tack, J.1

Source: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Volume 19, Number 12, June 2004 , pp. 1261-1268(8)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Buy & download fulltext article:

You have access to the full text article on a website external to ingentaconnect.

Please click here to view this article on Wiley Online Library.

You may be required to register and activate access on Wiley Online Library before you can obtain the full text. If you have any queries please visit Wiley Online Library

Abstract:

Summary Background

: Intraduodenal administration of lipids, through lipid digestion and release of cholecystokinin (CCK), induces viscero-visceral reflexes that affect gastric tone and sensitivity. It is unclear whether the same mechanisms control gastric function after an orally ingested meal. Aim

: To evaluate the effect of orlistat, a selective lipase inhibitor, on gastric response to an orally administered meal. Methods

: Eighteen healthy volunteers participated in this study. They were treated for 5 days with orlistat (120 mg) or placebo t.d.s. in a double-blind randomized crossover design. During treatment, all subjects underwent a gastric barostat study, measurement of plasma CCK levels and a satiety drinking test. Results

: Although CCK plasma levels were significantly decreased, pre-treatment with orlistat failed to affect gastric compliance (72 ± 6 mL/mm Hg and 64 ± 6 mL/mm Hg, NS), gastric sensitivity (discomfort threshold 12.2 ± 0.6 mm Hg vs. 10.9 ± 0.6 mm Hg above minimal distending pressure, NS) or gastric accommodation (172 ± 41 mL vs. 206 ± 49 mL, NS) to an orally ingested meal. Furthermore, orlistat pre-treatment had no significant effect on the amount of calories ingested during a satiety drinking test (1329 ± 88 kcal vs. 1217 ± 115 kcal, NS). Conclusion

: Administration of a lipase inhibitor does not affect gastric compliance, sensitivity to distension and accommodation to an orally ingested meal, and does not influence meal-induced satiety.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02003.x

Affiliations: 1: Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium 2: Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital St. Luc, University of Louvain, Woluwe, Belgium

Publication date: 2004-06-01

Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page