Protection of human gastric mucosa against aspirin—enteric coating or dose reduction?
Authors: Cole1; Hudson1; Liew1; Murray1; Hawkey1; Heptinstall2
Source: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Volume 13, Number 2, February 1999 , pp. 187-193(7)
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
Abstract:
Background: Aspirin is widely used for cardiovascular prophylaxis. Aim: To compare the effectiveness of two widely-used strategies—dose reduction and enteric coating—for the minimization of gastric mucosal injury or toxicity. Methods: Twelve healthy volunteers were studied. On four separate occasions each received, under blinded conditions, five daily doses of plain aspirin 300 mg, plain aspirin 75 mg, enteric-coated aspirin 300 mg or placebo. Ex vivo prostaglandin E2 synthesis was stimulated by the vortex mixing of gastric mucosal biopsies in Tris saline and measured by radioimmunoassay. Mucosal injury was quantified both by counting erosions and with a visual analogue scale. Results: All three preparations reduced prostaglandin E2 synthesis by day five, by (median) 84% for plain aspirin 300 mg, by 80% for enteric coated aspirin 300 mg and by 63% for plain aspirin 75 mg. There was little mucosal injury prior to the start of each dose and period and no significant change with placebo. Plain aspirin caused a dose-dependent mucosal injury, with two (median, IQR 0-7) gastric erosions after five days of plain aspirin 75 mg, and 18 (2-26) after five days of plain aspirin 300 mg. With enteric-coated aspirin 300 mg there were 0 (0-1) gastric erosions (P = 0.003 compared to plain aspirin 300 mg P = 0.11, compared to plain aspirin 75 mg). Conclusion: Enteric coated aspirin reduces acute gastric mucosal injury to placebo levels, despite its inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis. Enteric coating is an appropriate strategy for the prevention of gastric mucosal damage induced by low-dose aspirin, which warrants systematic clinical evaluation.Document Type: Original article
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1999.00470.x
Affiliations: 1: Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital, Nottingham, UK, 2: Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
Click here for Page Help