If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Evaluation of traps used to monitor southern pine beetle aerial populations and sex ratios

$48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Download / Buy Article:



1 Various kinds of traps have been employed to monitor and forecast population trends of the southern pine beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann; Coleoptera: Scolytidae), but their accuracy in assessing pine-beetle abundance and sex ratio in the field has not been evaluated directly.

2 In this study, we used fluorescent powder to mark pine beetles emerging from six isolated infestations. We then compared estimates of total abundances and proportions of males emerging from within each infestation to the estimates from three types of traps: passive sticky traps (2, 5, 10 and 20 m away from the source of beetles), multi-funnel traps baited with pine beetle attractants (100 m away) and pine trees baited with attractants (also 100 m away).

3 We found that the proportion of males captured in traps was significantly affected by the type of trap used.

4 Within an infestation, equal proportions of males and females were marked (0.53 ± 0.02 males; mean ± SE), but the proportions captured in trap trees and passive traps were more female biased (0.42 ± 0.03 and 0.46 ± 0.01 males, respectively). On the other hand, funnel traps provided an estimate of the proportion of males that was nearly identical to the proportion from within infestations (0.51 ± 0.03).

5 Numbers of marked beetles captured in traps were uncorrelated with the numbers of marked beetles emerging from the focal infestations. This suggests that traps positioned around an infestation may not be effective at estimating relative abundances of beetles within the infestation.

Keywords: Bark beetles; Dendroctonus frontalis; dispersal; insect traps; mark–release–recapture; population monitoring

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-9563.2000.00053.x

Affiliations: 1: Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 2: 360, U.S.A. 3: 500 Shreveport Highway, Pineville, LA 7

Publication date: February 1, 2000

Related content



Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more