If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Gender differences in genetic and environmental influences on gambling: results from a sample of twins from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health

$48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Download / Buy Article:

Abstract:

ABSTRACT Aims 

To examine the extent to which genetic factors and shared and non-shared environmental factors are implicated in the development of gambling behaviors and to examine whether there are gender differences in the genetic and environmental contributors to gambling behaviors. Design 

A genetically informative analysis was performed by using DeFries–Fulker (DF) analysis. Setting 

Analysis of secondary data drawn from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health). Participants 

A total of 324 monozygotic (MZ) twins and 278 same-sex dizygotic (DZ) twins were included in the analysis. Of these twins, there were 150 male MZ twins, 144 male DZ twins, 174 female MZ twins and 134 female DZ twins. Measurements 

Gambling behavior was measured through eight self-reported questions that tapped a range of items designed to measure problems related to gambling. Self-reported measures of self-control and delinquent involvement were also included to examine the degree to which these factors covaried with gambling behavior. Findings 

The results of the DF analysis indicated that when male and female twin pairs were analyzed simultaneously, genetic factors explained approximately 70% of the variance in gambling and non-shared environmental factors explained the remaining variance. When gender-specific models were calculated, substantial gender differences emerged. For males, genetic factors explained approximately 85% of the variance in gambling, with the non-shared environment accounting for the remaining variance. For females, genetic factors explained none of the variance in gambling behaviors, while the shared environment explained 45% of the variance and the non-shared environment explained 55% of the variance. Conclusions 

Analysis of twins from the Add Health data suggests that there are significant gender differences in the genetic and environmental underpinnings to gambling behaviors.

Keywords: Gambling; gender differences; genetics; health; non-shared environment; twins

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02803.x

Affiliations: 1: College of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA, 2: School of Social Work and Public Health, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO, USA, 3: Department of Sociology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA and 4: Division of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA

Publication date: March 1, 2010

Related content

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more