A flicker paradigm for inducing change blindness reveals alcohol and cannabis information processing biases in social users
Authors: Jones, Barry T.; Jones, Ben C.; Smith, Helena1; Copley, Nicola1
Source: Addiction, Volume 98, Number 2, February 2003 , pp. 235-244(10)
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
Abstract:
Aim To apply a new paradigm using transient changes to visual scenes to explore information processing biases relating to `social' levels of alcohol and cannabis use. Participants Male and female student volunteers (n = 200) not self-reporting substance-related problems. Setting Quiet testing areas throughout the university campus. Design A flicker paradigm, for inducing change blindness with lighter and heavier social users of alcohol (experiment 1, n= 100) and social users and non-users of cannabis (experiment 2, n= 100), explored the associations between habitual level of use and the latency to detection of a single substance-related or neutral change made to a scene of grouped substance-related and neutral objects. Measurements Alcohol use was measured as the number of units of the heaviest drinking day from the previous week; cannabis use as the number of months of use in previous 12. Change-detection latency comparisons were used to evaluate processing biases. Findings In both experiments, (i) heavier social users detected substance-related changes quicker than lighter and non-users; (ii) lighter and non-users detected substance-neutral changes quicker than heavier users; (iii) heavier social users detected substance-related quicker than substance-neutral changes; and (iv) lighter and non-users detected substance-neutral changes quicker than substance-related changes. Conclusions Alcohol and cannabis processing biases are found at levels of social use, have the potential to influence future consumption and for this reason merit further research.Keywords: Alcohol; attentional bias; cannabis; change blindness; social use
Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00270.x
Affiliations: 1: Department of Psychology, University of Glasgow and
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content

Click here for Page Help