“Of And and Of : The Politics of Grammar and the Study of Religion”

Author: Ellis, Thomas B.¹

Source: Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, Volume 20, Number 3, 2008 , pp. 270-290(21)

Publisher: BRILL

Key:

- Free Content

- New Content

- Subscribed Content

- Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Grammatical constructions in course titles and research agendas reflect particular theoretical orientations in the study of religion. Privileging one construction over the others amounts to a politics of grammar. Two constructions are examined here—the conjunction and the genitive: “Religion and. . .” and “. . .of Religion.” Whereas non-reductive methods such as theology/phenomenology and cultural anthropology endorse the conjunction, reductive methodologies such as biological anthropology invoke the genitive. With the evidence amassing in favor of natural, human universals (pace cultural anthropology) and against supernatural realities (pace theology/phenomenology), the essay argues that only the genitive construction has a place in the study of religion.

Keywords: POLITICS OF GRAMMAR; THEOLOGY; PHENOMENOLOGY; ANTHROPOLOGY; METHODOLOGICAL AGNOSTICISM; STRONG AGNOSTICISM; NATURALISM

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1163/157006808X317482

Affiliations: 1: Appalachian State University

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$25.00 plus tax Refund Policy