Moral Vegetarianism from a Very Broad Basis

Author: DeGrazia, David

Source: Journal of Moral Philosophy, Volume 6, Number 2, 2009 , pp. 143-165(23)

Publisher: BRILL

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

This paper defends a qualified version of moral vegetarianism. It defends a weak thesis and, more tentatively, a strong thesis, both from a very broad basis that assumes neither that animals have rights nor that they are entitled to equal consideration. The essay's only assumption about moral status, an assumption defended in the analysis of the wrongness of cruelty to animals, is that sentient animals have at least some moral status. One need not be a strong champion of animal protection, then, to embrace moral vegetarianism. One need only assume some reasonable view of animals' moral status.

Keywords: ANIMALS; FACTORY FARMS; FAMILY FARMS; MEAT-EATING; MORAL STATUS; UNNECESSARY HARM; VEGETARIANISM

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1163/174552409X402313

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$35.00 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A