State Denunciation of Crime

Author: Bennett, Christopher

Source: Journal of Moral Philosophy, Volume 3, Number 3, 2006 , pp. 288-304(17)

Publisher: BRILL

Buy & download fulltext article:

Price: $35.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

In this paper I am concerned with a problem for communicative theories of punishment. On such theories, punishment is justified at least in part as the authoritative censure or condemnation of crime. But is this compatible with a broadly liberal political outlook? For while liberalism is generally thought to take only a very limited interest in its citizens' attitudes (seeing moral opinion as a matter of legitimate debate), the idea of state denunciation of crime seems precisely to be focused on the attitudes expressed in action. In this paper I analyse the elements of the communicative theory of punishment, assessing the extent to which they can be considered anti-liberal. I argue that, understood in a certain way, the communicative theory, though in some sense communitarian, is compatible with at least one central and attractive non-perfectionist strand in liberalism.

Keywords: communicative theory; Devlin; Duff; Hegel; von Hirsch; punishment

Document Type: Journal article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1740468106071222

Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy University of Sheffield Sheffield, UK, Email: c.bennett@shef.ac.uk

Publication date: 2006-11-01