Relating Faith Development and Religious Styles: Reflections in Light of Apostasy from Religious Fundamentalism

Author: Adam, Raoul J.1

Source: Archive for the Psychology of Religion / Archiv für Religionspychologie, Volume 30, Number 1, 2008 , pp. 201-231(31)

Publisher: BRILL

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

This paper provides a relational analysis of James Fowler's (1981) Faith Development Theory (FDT) and Heinz Streib's (2001) Religious Styles Perspective (RSP) in light of a recent study of apostasy from religious fundamentalisms. Empirical support is provided for both theories. RSP is endorsed as a more encompassing theory of religious development which accounts for more contingencies than FDT. However, FDT is subsumed rather than superseded by RSP as a powerful lens through which to observe cognitive dimensions of religious development. The paper introduces an integrative paradigm, phenomenological empiricism, to conceptualise a complementary relationship between FDT and RSP as key theories in the future study of religious development.

Keywords: FAITH DEVELOPMENT THEORY; RELIGIOUS STYLES PERSPECTIVE; APOSTASY; RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISM; PHENOMENOLOGICAL EMPIRICISM

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1163/157361208X317204

Affiliations: 1: School of Education, James Cook University, Australia;, Email: Raoul.Adam@jcu.edu.au

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$35.00 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A