Measuring the Unmeasurable by Ticking Boxes and Opening Pandora's Box? Mixed Methods Research as a Useful Tool for Investigating Exceptional and Spiritual Experiences

Authors: Kohls, Niko1; Hack, Anna2; Walach, Harald3

Source: Archive for the Psychology of Religion / Archiv für Religionspychologie, Volume 30, Number 1, 2008 , pp. 155-187(33)

Publisher: BRILL

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

A monomethod bias still prevails in the psychology of religion, with the developing field studying the relationship between religiosity, spirituality and health being almost completely dominated by questionnaire research. This comes as a surprise, because the experiential side of religion, spirituality, can by definition be regarded as inner and private experiences of transcendence that have frequently been described as being of utmost importance. At first glance, from this perspective, standardized questionnaire scales appear to be inappropriate for “measuring the unmeasurable”. Until now, no questionnaire instrument developed for the purpose of assessing spiritual and religious experiences has been qualitatively double-checked for intermethod validity. In order to throw light on whether questionnaire instruments are appropriate for measuring domains of spiritual and transcendental experiences, we tested a newly developed questionnaire instrument, the Exceptional Experience Questionnaire (EEQ), for intermethod validity by conducting post-questionnaire interviews (N = 35). This revealed that the EEQ was able to grasp these experiences within reasonable limits. However, two thirds of our interview sample said that the study had changed how they viewed these experiences. These findings suggest that the reactivity of quantitative instruments in grasping spiritual and transcendental domains should be taken into account, especially when devising longitudinal designs and further research is clearly needed. As a consequence, introducing a reflective circle of results stemming from both quantitative and qualitative approaches is recommended as the most useful and appropriate research tool for studying spiritual or mystical experiences, if not all constructs.

Keywords: SPIRITUAL EXPERIENCES; TRANSPERSONAL PSYCHOLOGY; SPIRITUALITY; MIXED METHODS RESEARCH; LONGITUDINAL DESIGNS; INTERMETHOD VALIDITY

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1163/157361208X317123

Affiliations: 1: Generation Research Program, Human Science Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Prof.-Max-Lange-Platz 11, 83646 Bad Tölz, Germany; , Brain, Mind and Healing Program, Samueli Institute, Washington, USA, Email: kohls@grp.hwz.uni-muenchen.de 2: Email: anna_hack@web.de 3: Department of Psychology, University of Northampton, Boughton Green Rd, Northampton NN2 7AL, UK, Brain, Mind and Healing Program, Samueli Institute, Washington, USA;, Email: harald.walach@northampton.ac.uk

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$25.00 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A