Selective processing of threat-related cues in day surgery patients and prediction of post-operative pain
Authors: Munafò M.R.1; Stevenson J.
Source: British Journal of Health Psychology, Volume 8, Number 4, November 2003 , pp. 439-449(11)
Publisher: British Psychological Society
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
Abstract:
Objective: To investigate the use of a measure of selective processing bias associated with anxiety as a predictor of post-operative pain independently of self-report measures of anxiety. Methods: Forty-seven women admitted for minor gynaecological surgical procedures completed a selective processing task (modified Stroop) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory immediately prior to surgery. Following surgery they completed the McGill Short-Form Pain Questionnaire. Intraoperative analgesia consumption was also recorded. Results: Participants demonstrated significantly slower colour-naming times for physical threat cues than control cues. This was not due to an emotionality effect, as colour-naming times for neutral and positive cues were not significantly different. This bias was congruent with the participants' current concerns, as colour-naming times were significantly slower for physical threat words than for social threat words. This index of selective processing bias significantly predicted post-operative pain independently of self-reported state and trait anxiety. Conclusions: The advantages of measures of psychological constructs that are not reliant on self-reporting are discussed.Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.1348/135910703770238293
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content

Click here for Page Help