Communication in collaborative discovery learning

Authors: Saab, Nadira1; Joolingen, Wouter R.van1; Hout-Wolters, Bernadette H. A. M.van1

Source: British Journal of Educational Psychology, Volume 75, Number 4, December 2005 , pp. 603-621(19)

Publisher: British Psychological Society

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Background. Constructivist approaches to learning focus on learning environments in which students have the opportunity to construct knowledge themselves, and negotiate this knowledge with others. Discovery learning and collaborative learning are examples of learning contexts that cater for knowledge construction processes. We introduce a computer-based learning environment in which the two forms of learning are implemented simultaneously. We focus on the interaction between discovery learning and collaborative learning.

Aim. We aim to investigate which communicative activities are frequently used in the discovery learning process and which communicative and discovery activities co-occur.

Sample. The study involved 21 pairs of 10th-grade students enrolled in pre-university education, ranging from 15 to 17 years of age.

Method. Participants worked in dyads on separate screens in a shared discovery learning environment. They communicated using a chat box. In order to find a possible relationship between communicative activities and discovery learning processes, correlational analysis and principal component analysis were performed.

Result. Significant relationships were found between communicative and discovery activities, as well as five factors combining the communicative process and the discovery learning processes. Communicative activities are performed most frequently during the activities in generating hypotheses, experimental design, and conclusion construction. Argumentation occurs less than expected, and is associated with the construction of conclusions, rather than generating hypotheses.

Conclusion. Communicative activities co-occur with discovery activities most of the time, as we expected. Further research should concentrate on means to augment communicative and discovery activities that are related to positive learning outcomes.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1348/000709905X42905

Affiliations: 1: Graduate School of Teaching and Learning, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$24.40 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A