Skip to main content

JUDAISM, DARWINISM, AND THE TYPOLOGY OF SUFFERING

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Abstract. 

Darwinism has attracted proportionately less attention from Jewish thinkers than from Christian thinkers. One significant reason for the disparity is that the theodicies created by Jews to contend with the catastrophes which punctuated Jewish history are equally suited to address the massive extinctions which characterize natural history. Theologies of divine hiddenness, restraint, and radical immanence, coming together in the sixteenth-century mystical cosmogony of Isaac Luria, have been rehabilitated and reworked by modern Jewish thinkers in the post-Darwin era.

Keywords: Abraham Joshua Heschel; Darwinism; Eliezer Berkovits; Hans Jonas; divine self-restraint; evolution; exile; hiding of God's face; immanence; post-Holocaust theology; suffering; theodicy; typology; zimzum

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01175.x

Affiliations: Shai Cherry is the Education Director at Tifereth Israel Synagogue in San Diego, California. He may be contacted at 13727 Condesa Drive, Del Mar, CA 92014, USA;, Email: shai.cherry@gmail.com.

Publication date: 2011-06-01

  • Access Key
  • Free ContentFree content
  • Partial Free ContentPartial Free content
  • New ContentNew content
  • Open Access ContentOpen access content
  • Partial Open Access ContentPartial Open access content
  • Subscribed ContentSubscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed ContentPartial Subscribed content
  • Free Trial ContentFree trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more