Skip to main content


Buy Article:

$43.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)


A 1991 article by psychologist John D. Carter offers an underdeveloped insight that typologies for relating science and religion might be fruitfully formulated in discipline-specific perspectives. This essay thus covers a specifically theological perspective only briefly outlined in Carter, and it expands four models that theologians have used to relate religion and science. This essay renames these models and expands their implications, especially for addressing the behavioral sciences. (1) The contrarian model generally opposes science, (2) the apologetic makes theology congenial to science, (3) the correlational holds both disciplines in tension, and (4) the synthetic attempts a grand unification of them. Arguing from the theologian's perspective, this essay is intended to demonstrate that different models/methods for relating science and religion are really reflections of deeper religious attitudes and argues that the task for which a method is employed ultimately determines its adequacy within that attitude's constraints.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: apologetics; contrarian; correlation; methodology; model; religion; science; synthetic; typology

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: David J. Zehnder is a Ph.D. candidate at Concordia St. Louis currently working in theological library research, 801 Seminary Place, St. Louis, MO 63105, USA;, Email: [email protected]

Publication date: 01 March 2011

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more