Skip to main content


Buy Article:

$43.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)


A more complete understanding of the biocultural evolutionary origins of the concept of ought as developed by David Hume and G. E. Moore may lower the philosophical barrier between is and ought and provide new insights about the separations between the domains of religion and science. If this conjecture is correct, the resulting wisdom will help transcend a major source of irony that Philip Hefner has so aptly identified in his essay.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: biocultural evolution; ethics; is; naturalistic fallacy; ought

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Professor of Anthropology at the University of Pennsylvania and director of the Krogman Growth Center. His mailing address is 762 E. Passyunk Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19147;, Email: [email protected]

Publication date: 2010-06-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more