Skip to main content


Buy Article:

$43.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)


The category of emergence has come to be of considerable importance to the science-and-religion dialogue. It has become clear that the term is used in different ways by different authors, with important implications. In this article I examine the criteria used to state that something is emergent and the different interpretations of those criteria. In particular, I argue similarly to Philip Clayton that there are three broad ranges of interpretation of emergence: reductive, nonreductive, and radical. Although all three criteria have their place, I suggest that the category of radical emergence is important both for science and theology.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: emergence; nonreductive physicalism; reductionism; supervenience; top-down causation

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Associate Professor of Philosophy and Religion and Program Coordinator of the Philosophy and Religion Department at South Dakota State University, Box 504 Scobey 336, Brookings, SD 57007;, Email: [email protected]

Publication date: 2006-09-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more