Demarcation and the Scientistic Fallacy

$48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Download / Buy Article:

Abstract:

Abstract.

For many theologians and philosophers, scientism is among the greatest of intellectual sins. In its most commonly cited form, scientism consists in claiming that science is the only source of real knowledge and, therefore, that what science does not discover does not exist. Because the charge of scientism is frequently levied, it is important to be clear about what exactly is being claimed in its name. I argue that scientism can best be understood as a fallacy, specifically as a kind of category mistake. Being clear about this requires an examination of the relationship of scientism to the question of demarcation between science and nonscience, a question that has potential implications for theology.

Keywords: Mikael Stenmark; demarcation; reductionism; scientism; scientistic fallacy

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2003.00536.x

Affiliations: South Dakota State University, USA

Publication date: December 1, 2003

Related content

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more