Skip to main content

The Intelligent-Design Movement: Science or Ideology?

Buy Article:

$43.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

The past decade has seen the rise of a new wave of criticism of evolutionary biology, led by claims that it should be replaced by a new science of intelligent design. While the general question of inferring design may fairly be considered worthy of attention, claims that intelligent-design theory (IDT) constitutes a biological science are highly problematic. This article briefly summarizes the assertions made about IDT as a biological science and indicates why they do not stand up to analysis. While claiming that IDT is a biological science, its advocates have failed to actually produce a research program that merits serious attention. As such, it is clear that IDT is more driven by ideological considerations than by attention to actual scientific research.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Imre Lakatos; Michael Behe; William Dembski; demarcation; evolutionary theory; intelligent-design theory

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Thiel College, USA [email protected]

Publication date: 2002-03-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more