Skip to main content

Labour electoral landslides and the changing efficiency of voting distributions

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

The translation of votes into seats under first–past–the–post electoral systems with single–member constituencies invariably results in disproportional allocations of seats relative to votes among the main two parties. It also tends to produce biased outcomes, with one party getting a more disproportionate share of the seats with a given share of the votes than does its opponent. In Great Britain, these biases favoured the Conservative party until the 1980s, but now strongly favour Labour. Production of those biases results from a variety of influences involving the interaction of the geography of party support with that of constituency boundaries. Increasingly, that interaction has favoured Labour: without any explicit manipulation of the constituency map to its own ends, it now benefits substantially from the equivalent of the malapportionment and gerrymandering cartographic abuses typical of the United States, because of its ability to manipulate its vote distribution within the constituency system.

Keywords: Labour party; United Kingdom; electoral bias; vote efficiency

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-5661.00058

Affiliations: 1: University of Bristol r.johnston@bristol.ac.uk 2: University of Leeds, 3: University of Sheffield

Publication date: September 1, 2002

bpl/tran/2002/00000027/00000003/art00005
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more