This discussion piece critically examines some of the key ideology that figures in Elizabeth Fricker's ‘Stating and Insinuating’(2012), raises a number of queries about the details of Fricker's argumentation, and develops some ideas about the normative structure of testimony that relate to the themes of that paper.
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Magdalen College, High Street, Oxford OX1 4AU, UK
Publication date: 01 June 2012