Skip to main content

II—TransparentSelf-Knowledge

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

I distinguish two ways of explaining our capacity for ‘transparent’ knowledge of our own present beliefs, perceptions, and intentions: an inferential and a reflective approach. Alex Byrne (2011) has defended an inferential approach, but I argue that this approach faces a basic difficulty, and that a reflective approach avoids the difficulty. I conclude with a brief sketch and defence of a reflective approach to our transparent self-knowledge, and I show how this approach is connected with the thesis that we must distinguish between a kind of self-knowledge that is of oneself as agent and another kind that is of oneself as patient.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2011.00204.x

Affiliations: Department of Philosophy, Emerson Hall, Harvard University Cambridge, MA 02138, USA., Email: boyle2@fas.harvard.edu

Publication date: 2011-06-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more