Skip to main content

II—FictiveUtterance andImaginingII

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

The currently standard approach to fiction is to define it in terms of imagination. I have argued elsewhere (Friend 2008) that no conception of imagining is sufficient to distinguish a response appropriate to fiction as opposed to non-fiction. In her contribution Kathleen Stock seeks to refute this objection by providing a more sophisticated account of the kind of propositional imagining prescribed by so-called ‘fictive utterances’. I argue that although Stock's proposal improves on other theories, it too fails to provide an adequate criterion of fictionality. I conclude by sketching an alternative account according to which fiction is a genre.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2011.00201.x

Affiliations: Department of Philosophy, Heythrop College, University of London, Kensington Square, London W8 5HN, UK., Email: s.friend@heythrop.ac.uk

Publication date: June 1, 2011

bpl/supa/2011/00000085/00000001/art00009
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more