A popular approach to defining fictive utterance says that, necessarily, it is intended to produce imagining. I shall argue that this is not falsified by the fact that some fictive utterances are intended to be believed, or are non-accidentally true. That this is so becomes apparent given a proper understanding of the relation of what one imagines to one's belief set. In light of this understanding, I shall then argue that being intended to produce imagining is sufficient for fictive utterance as well.
No Supplementary Data
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: Department of Philosophy, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QN, UK., Email: email@example.com
Publication date: 2011-06-01