Skip to main content

On the use of corrections for overdispersion

Buy Article:

$43.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

In studying fluctuations in the size of a blackgrouse (Tetrao tetrix) population, an autoregressive model using climatic conditions appears to follow the change quite well. However, the deviance of the model is considerably larger than its number of degrees of freedom. A widely used statistical rule of thumb holds that overdispersion is present in such situations, but model selection based on a direct likelihood approach can produce opposing results. Two further examples, of binomial and of Poisson data, have models with deviances that are almost twice the degrees of freedom and yet various overdispersion models do not fit better than the standard model for independent data. This can arise because the rule of thumb only considers a point estimate of dispersion, without regard for any measure of its precision. A reasonable criterion for detecting overdispersion is that the deviance be at least twice the number of degrees of freedom, the familiar Akaike information criterion, but the actual presence of overdispersion should then be checked by some appropriate modelling procedure.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Akaike information criterion; Beta–binomial distribution; Direct likelihood inference; Negative binomial distribution; Overdispersion

Document Type: Original Article

Affiliations: Limburgs Universitair Centrum, Diepenbeek, Belgium

Publication date: 1999-01-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more