Skip to main content

Biases in the healthcare luxury good hypothesis?: a meta-regression analysis

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Summary. 

Although a growing literature examining the relationship between income and health expenditures suggests that healthcare is a luxury good, this conclusion is debatable owing to heterogeneity of the existing results. The paper tests the luxury good hypothesis (namely that income elasticity exceeds 1) by using meta-regression analysis, taking into consideration publication selection and aggregation bias. The findings suggest that publication bias exists, which is a result that is robust to the meta-regression model employed. Publication selection and aggregation bias also appear to play a role in the generation of estimates. The corrected estimates of income elasticity range from 0.4 to 0.8, which cast serious doubt on the validity of the luxury good hypothesis.

Keywords: Aggregate health expenditure; Healthcare; Income elasticity; Luxury goods; Meta-regression analysis; Regional health expenditure

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2010.00653.x

Affiliations: 1: London School of Economics and Political Science, UK 2: Universitat de Barcelona, Spain

Publication date: 2011-01-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more