Skip to main content

A response to M. Stone: ‘How not to measure the efficiency of public services (and how one might)’

Buy Article:

$43.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)


This is a response to Stone's criticisms of the Spottiswoode report to the UK Treasury which was responding to the Treasury's request for improved methods to evaluate the efficiency and productivity of the 43 police districts in England and Wales. The Spottiswoode report recommended uses of data envelopment analysis (DEA) and stochastic frontier analysis (SFA), which Stone critiqued en route to proposing an alternative approach. Here we note some of the most serious errors in his criticism and inaccurate portrayals of DEA and SFA. Most of our attention is devoted to DEA, and to Stone's recommended alternative approach without much attention to SFA, partly because of his abbreviated discussion of the latter. In our response we attempt to be constructive as well as critical by showing how Stone's proposed approach can be joined to DEA to expand his proposal beyond limitations in his formulations.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Data envelopment analysis; Evaluating police performances; Stochastic frontier analysis; Weights

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: University of Texas at Austin, USA 2: University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA

Publication date: 2008-04-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more