Skip to main content

A comparison of multiple imputation and doubly robust estimation for analyses with missing data

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Summary. 

Multiple imputation is now a well-established technique for analysing data sets where some units have incomplete observations. Provided that the imputation model is correct, the resulting estimates are consistent. An alternative, weighting by the inverse probability of observing complete data on a unit, is conceptually simple and involves fewer modelling assumptions, but it is known to be both inefficient (relative to a fully parametric approach) and sensitive to the choice of weighting model. Over the last decade, there has been a considerable body of theoretical work to improve the performance of inverse probability weighting, leading to the development of ‘doubly robust’ or ‘doubly protected’ estimators. We present an intuitive review of these developments and contrast these estimators with multiple imputation from both a theoretical and a practical viewpoint.

Keywords: Double robustness; Inverse probability weighting; Missing at random; Multiple imputation

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00407.x

Affiliations: 1: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK 2: Ghent University, Belgium

Publication date: July 1, 2006

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Partial Open Access Content
Partial Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more