Skip to main content

Number needed to treat: properties and problems

Buy Article:

The full text article is temporarily unavailable.

We apologise for the inconvenience. Please try again later.

The inverse of a difference in probabilities, called the ‘number needed to treat’, has been promoted in the medical literature as a good way to present the results of modelling binary outcomes. The usual context is randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. In this paper we discuss the claims that have been made about this statistic, and the problems associated with it. Methods which have been proposed for confidence intervals are evaluated and shown to be erroneous. We suggest that the difference in probabilities, the ‘absolute risk reduction’, is preferable to the number needed to treat, for both theoretical and practical reasons.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Absolute risk reduction; Comparison of proportions; Likelihood ratio test; Number needed to treat; Odds ratio; Risk ratio; Wald test

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: University of Newcastle, UK

Publication date: 01 March 2000

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more