Skip to main content

Statistical review by research ethics committees

Buy Article:

$43.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

This paper discusses some of the issues surrounding statistical review by research ethics committees (RECs). A survey of local RECs in 1997 revealed that only 27/184 (15%) included a statistician member at that time, although 70/175 (40%) recognized the need for such. The role of the statistician member is considered and the paper includes a summary of a meeting of the Royal Statistical Society to discuss statistical issues that frequently arise in the review of REC applications. A list of minimum qualifications which RECs should expect from anyone claiming to be a statistician would be useful, together with a list of statisticians who are well qualified and willing to serve on RECs, and a list of training courses for REC members covering the appropriate statistical issues.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Research ethics committee; Scientific validity; Statistical review; Statistician membership; Survey

Document Type: Original Article

Affiliations: 1: University of Liverpool, UK, 2: University of Newcastle, UK, 3: Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK, 4: Salford Research Ethics Committee, UK, 5: University of Sheffield, UK, 6: Bulletin of Medical Ethics, London, UK

Publication date: 2000-02-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more