Skip to main content

Clear Choices and Guesswork in Peremptory Challenges in Federal Criminal Trials

Buy Article:

The full text article is temporarily unavailable.

We apologise for the inconvenience. Please try again later.


The traditional practice of permitting lawyers to strike jurors by peremptory challenge is being subjected to new questioning in the USA. Previous studies of strikes have used simulations or questionnaires, raising doubt about their relevance in actual trials. In this paper we report on a study that uses actual trial data and a mathematical model to estimate the extent to which the lawyers' selections are clear choices on which all lawyers would agree or are guesswork involving essentially random choices. The results are that only a small proportion of the challenges are clear choices, a conclusion that is consistent with the findings of simulation studies.


Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, New York, USA 2: Columbia School of Public Health, New York, USA

Publication date: 1997-02-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more