Skip to main content

Risk, Return, and Performance Measurement: A Case of Unrealistic Expectations?

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Abstract

Client criteria imposed upon active asset management companies to hold only high-quality (HQ) investments in achieving specific Treasury-adjusted spreads and above-average rates of return effectively mandate a passive management policy and can be met only with very low probability. HQ investments do not consistently outperform either medium (MQ) or low quality (LQ) investments over time regardless of whether returns are measured monthly, quarterly, or yearly. Further, both time series and cross-sectional results show that HQ sectors are generally associated with ex post returns that are lower than those for either MQ or LQ sectors. Finally, HQ sectors do not outperform MQ and LQ sectors in consistently surpassing Treasury spreads or crediting rates. These results suggest that periodic evaluation of asset performance in light of such stringent criteria misunderstands the dynamic nature of the market as well as fundamental risk/return relationships.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6296.2007.00105.x

Affiliations: Joseph M. Goebel is with Indiana University purdue University-Columbus, 4601 Central Avenue, Columbus, IN 47203-1769; phone: 812-348-7290;, Fax: 812-348-7276, Email: jgoebel@indiana.edu.

Publication date: 2007-03-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more