Skip to main content

RESTRICTIVE CONSEQUENTIALISM AND REAL FRIENDSHIP

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Abstract

A familiar objection to restrictive consequentialism is that a restrictive consequentialist is incapable of having true friendships. In this paper I distinguish between an instrumentalist and a non-instrumentalist version of this objection and argue that while the restrictive consequentialist can answer the non-instrumentalist version, restrictive consequentialism may still seem vulnerable to the instrumentalist version. I then suggest a consequentialist reply that I argue also works against this version of the objection. Central to this reply is the claim that a restrictive consequentialist is capable of true friendship if the value she aims for is not merely seen as a function of her self-regarding desires, but includes as a central constituent a form of objective value often referred to as ‘flourishing’ or ‘self-realization’. 1

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.2007.00356.x

Affiliations: Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and IdeasUniversity of OsloP.O. Box 1020 Blindern0315 OsloNorway, Email: edmund.henden@ifikk.uio.no

Publication date: June 1, 2007

bpl/rati/2007/00000020/00000002/art00003
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more