Skip to main content

MORAL PSYCHOLOGY AND THE UNITY OF THE VIRTUES

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Abstract

The ancient Greeks subscribed to the thesis of the Unity of Virtue, according to which the possession of one virtue is closely related to the possession of all the others. Yet empirical observation seems to contradict this thesis at every turn. What could the Greeks have been thinking of? The paper offers an interpretation and a tentative defence of a qualified version of the thesis. It argues that, as the Greeks recognized, virtue essentially involves knowledge – specifically, evaluative knowledge of what matters. Furthermore, such knowledge is essentially holistic. Perfect and complete possession of one virtue thus requires the knowledge that is needed for the possession of every other virtue. The enterprise of trying to reconcile the normative view embodied in this conception of virtue with empirical observation also serves as a case study for the field of moral psychology in which empirical and normative claims are often deeply and confusingly intertwined. 1

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.2007.00354.x

Affiliations: University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill, North Carolina, Email: srwolf@unc.edu

Publication date: June 1, 2007

bpl/rati/2007/00000020/00000002/art00001
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more