Skip to main content

HOW TO ANALYSE SUBSTANCE: A REPLY TO SCHNIEDER

Buy Article:

$43.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract

In a recent issue of this journal, Benjamin Schnieder has presented an objection to the account of individual substance that we have developed and put to various uses in our works on metaphysics. According to Schnieder's objection, our proposal to analyse this notion of substantiality suffers from a special kind of circularity. In this paper, we give two replies to Schnieder's objection. The first is that a successful analysis is not, in fact, required to avoid the sort of circularity about which Schnieder complains. The second is that our analysis does not involve the alleged circularity.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Department of PhilosophyUniversity of North Carolina at GreensboroGreensboro, North Carolina 27402-6170USA, Email: [email protected] 2: Department of PhilosophyUniversity of North Carolina at GreensboroGreensboro, North Carolina 27402-6170USA, Email: [email protected]

Publication date: 2007-03-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more