IngentaConnect Against Narrativity

Author: Galen Strawson¹

Source: Ratio, Volume 17, Number 4, December 2004 , pp. 428-452(25)

Abstract:

I argue against two popular claims. The first is a descriptive, empirical thesis about the nature of ordinary human experience: ‘each of us constructs and lives a “narrative” . . . this narrative is us, our identities’ (Oliver Sacks); ‘self is a perpetually rewritten story . . . in the end, we become the autobiographical narratives by which we “tell about” our lives’ (Jerry Bruner); ‘we are all virtuoso novelists. . . . We try to make all of our material cohere into a single good story. And that story is our autobiography. The chief fictional character . . . of that autobiography is one’s self’ (Dan Dennett). The second is a normative, ethical claim: we ought to live our lives narratively, or as a story; a ‘basic condition of making sense of ourselves is that we grasp our lives in a narrative’ and have an understanding of our lives ‘as an unfolding story’ (Charles Taylor). A person ‘creates his identity [only] by forming an autobiographical narrative – a story of his life’, and must be in possession of a full and ‘explicit narrative [of his life] to develop fully as a person’ (Marya Schechtman).

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2004.00264.x

Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy, University of Reading

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$41.89 plus tax