Davidson on Causal Relevance
Davidson argues that mental properties are causally relevant properties. I argue that Davidson cannot appeal to ceteris paribus causal laws to ensure that these properties are causally relevant, if he wishes to retain his argument for anomalous monism. Second, I argue that the appeal to supervenience cannot, by itself, give us an account of the causal relevancy of mental properties. I argue that, while mental properties may indeed ‘make a difference’ to the causally efficacious properties of events, this is not sufficient to show that mental properties are causally relevant.
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: Department of Philosophy, McGill University, 855 Sherbrooke St. West., Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2T7 [email protected]
Publication date: 01 March 1999