If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

How Kant's View of Perfect and Imperfect Duties Resolves an Alleged Moral Dilemma for Judges

$48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Download / Buy Article:



I clarify Kant's classification of duties and criticize the apocryphal tradition that, according to Kant, perfect duties trump imperfect duties. I then use Kant's view to argue that judges who believe that an action is immoral and should be illegal need not set aside their beliefs in order to comply with binding precedents that permit the action. The same view of morality that causes some people to oppose certain actions, including abortion, requires lower–court judges to comply with binding precedents. Therefore, someone's opposition to legal abortion, by itself, does not justify opposing that person's nomination to a lower court.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2005.00307.x

Affiliations: Ohio Dominican University 1216 Sunbury Road Columbus, OH 43219 U.S.A., Email: masekL@ohiodominican.edu

Publication date: December 1, 2005

Related content



Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more