Skip to main content

Gustav Radbruch vs. Hans Kelsen: A Debate on Nazi Law

Buy Article:

$48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Abstract. 

Can the label “law” apply to rules as amoral as the enactments of the Nazis? This question confronted the courts in Germany after 1945. In dealing with it, the judges had to take sides in the philosophical debate over the concept of law. In this context, the prominent voices of the legal philosophers Gustav Radbruch and Hans Kelsen could not go unheard. This paper draws on what could have been the “Radbruch-Kelsen debate on Nazi Law.” In examining the debate, it will argue for a substantive account of the morality of the law, as expressed in Radbruch's Formula.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2005.00293.x

Affiliations: University of Lausanne, Centre Lémanique d’Ethique, Switzerland, Email: Frank.Haldemann@dtheol.unil.ch

Publication date: June 1, 2005

bpl/raju/2005/00000018/00000002/art00003
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more