Skip to main content

Experimental Test of a

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Abstract— In this study, fifteen managers and scientists experimented with the use of a Q‐sort procedure for evaluating and prioritizing thirteen research projects. Q‐sorting is a psychometric method for classifying items according to the opinions of a group of persons, and for evoking group consensus on these classifications. The procedure focuses on the rather natural individual opinion/group decision making process that must take place in project selection/evaluation. In general, the participants thought that Q‐sorting was too imprecise to yield final decisions. However, progress was made toward organizational consensus, and the participants felt the procedure was valuable for facilitating scientist/scientist and the scientist‐manager communications within the project evaluation process. It was therefore concluded that Q‐sorting may be a valuable aid to the heuristic idea‐exchange process that should accompany any formal project selection exercise. The results here suggest that Q‐sorting may be a good procedure to facilitate the use of a mathematical project selection model.

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1975.tb01361.x

Publication date: 1975-02-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more