If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Experimental Test of a

$48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Download / Buy Article:

Abstract:

Abstract— In this study, fifteen managers and scientists experimented with the use of a Q‐sort procedure for evaluating and prioritizing thirteen research projects. Q‐sorting is a psychometric method for classifying items according to the opinions of a group of persons, and for evoking group consensus on these classifications. The procedure focuses on the rather natural individual opinion/group decision making process that must take place in project selection/evaluation. In general, the participants thought that Q‐sorting was too imprecise to yield final decisions. However, progress was made toward organizational consensus, and the participants felt the procedure was valuable for facilitating scientist/scientist and the scientist‐manager communications within the project evaluation process. It was therefore concluded that Q‐sorting may be a valuable aid to the heuristic idea‐exchange process that should accompany any formal project selection exercise. The results here suggest that Q‐sorting may be a good procedure to facilitate the use of a mathematical project selection model.

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1975.tb01361.x

Publication date: February 1, 1975

Related content

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more