IngentaConnect Assessing the Performance of Voluntary Environmental Programs: Do...

Authors: Darnall, Nicole¹; Sides, Stephen²

Source: Policy Studies Journal, Volume 36, Number 1, February 2008 , pp. 95-117(23)

Abstract:

The promotion of voluntary environmental programs (VEPs) as alternative approaches to traditional environmental regulation has fueled numerous researchers to evaluate VEP performance. However, these studies have focused on assessing the environmental performance of a single VEP. As yet, we know little about the overall environmental benefits of these programs. Moreover, questions remain about whether VEPs designed with different monitoring regimes—related to whether programs are self-monitored or undergo external certification—vary in their ability to improve environmental conditions. Using meta-analysis methodology, this article evaluates the aggregated environmental outcomes of U.S. VEPs drawing on data from nine studies and over 30,000 firms. We show that collectively VEP participants do not improve their environmental performance over nonparticipants. Rather, nonparticipants improve their environmental performance by 7.7 percent more than VEP participants. Additionally, nonparticipants improve the environment 24 percent more than participants in self-monitored VEPs, whereas participants in International Standards Organization 14001 as a group exhibit inconclusive environmental performance improvements.

Keywords: voluntary environmental programs; certification; self-monitoring; environmental performance; meta-analysis

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00255.x

Affiliations: 1: George Mason University., Email: ndarnall@gmu.edu 2: George Mason University., Email: ssides1@gmu.edu

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$41.19 plus tax Refund Policy

Assessing the Performance of Voluntary Environmental Programs: Does Certification Matter?