Language Is Not Just for Talking: Redundant Labels Facilitate Learning of Novel Categories

Authors: Lupyan, Gary; Rakison, David H.¹; McClelland, James L.²

Source: Psychological Science, Volume 18, Number 12, December 2007 , pp. 1077-1083(7)

Purchase options

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$39.62 plus tax Refund Policy

More like this?

In this: publication
By this: publisher
In this Subject: Psychology
By this author: Lupyan, Gary ; Rakison, David H. ; McClelland, James L.

Content Key:

- Free

- New

- Open Access

- Subscribed

- Free Trial

Abstract:

In addition to having communicative functions, verbal labels may play a role in shaping concepts. Two experiments assessed whether the presence of labels affected category formation. Subjects learned to categorize “aliens” as those to be approached or those to be avoided. After accuracy feedback on each response was provided, a nonsense label was either presented or not. Providing nonsense category labels facilitated category learning even though the labels were redundant and all subjects had equivalent experience with supervised categorization of the stimuli. A follow-up study investigated differences between learning verbal and nonverbal associations and showed that learning a nonverbal association did not facilitate categorization. The findings show that labels make category distinctions more concrete and bear directly on the language-and-thought debate.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02028.x

Affiliations: 1: Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University; 2: Department of Psychology, Stanford University