Language Is Not Just for Talking: Redundant Labels Facilitate Learning of Novel Categories

Authors: Lupyan, Gary; Rakison, David H.1; McClelland, James L.2

Source: Psychological Science, Volume 18, Number 12, December 2007 , pp. 1077-1083(7)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Buy & download fulltext article:

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

Abstract:

In addition to having communicative functions, verbal labels may play a role in shaping concepts. Two experiments assessed whether the presence of labels affected category formation. Subjects learned to categorize “aliens” as those to be approached or those to be avoided. After accuracy feedback on each response was provided, a nonsense label was either presented or not. Providing nonsense category labels facilitated category learning even though the labels were redundant and all subjects had equivalent experience with supervised categorization of the stimuli. A follow-up study investigated differences between learning verbal and nonverbal associations and showed that learning a nonverbal association did not facilitate categorization. The findings show that labels make category distinctions more concrete and bear directly on the language-and-thought debate.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02028.x

Affiliations: 1: Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University; 2: Department of Psychology, Stanford University

Publication date: 2007-12-01

Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page