The Correlates and Consequences of Newspaper Reports of Research on Sex Differences

Authors: Victoria Brescoll; Marianne LaFrance

Source: Psychological Science, Volume 15, Number 8, August 2004 , pp. 515-520(6)

Buy & download fulltext article:

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

Abstract:

Correlates and consequences of newspaper accounts of research on sex differences were examined. In Study 1, articles from high-circulation newspapers were coded for the degree to which biological factors were used to explain sex differences. Results showed that political conservatism and traditional attitudes toward gender roles coded from other newspaper sections predicted greater use of biological explanations than did political liberalism and less traditional attitudes toward gender roles. In Studies 2 and 3, participants read a fictional newspaper article reporting research on a gender difference that cited either biological or sociocultural factors as explaining the difference. Results showed that exposure to biological explanations significantly increased participants' endorsement of gender stereotypes. Moreover, exposure to social explanations significantly increased participants' belief in the mutability of human behavior. Together, these studies show that political ideology influences how the popular press reports research findings and that such reporting in turn affects readers' beliefs and attitudes.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00712.x

Affiliations: 1: Yale University

Publication date: 2004-08-01