Skip to main content

Masculinism, Emplacement, and Positionality in Peer Review

Buy Article:

$43.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

In this article I examine peer review (refereeing) of manuscripts for geography journals, focusing in particular upon the discourse of refereeing. I suggest that this discourse is constituted through seemingly banal practices and that it constructs and positions referees, the conceptual space of geography, and the knowledge produced by academics about specific places. Drawing upon feminist theory, I suggest that the dominant practice of “blind” (and “double-blind”) refereeing relies upon a masculinist model of “objectivity” that is disembodied, impartial, and unlocated. This approach to peer review, I argue, genders geographic theory, reconstitutes abstract Cartesian space, and effaces place.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: emplacing knowledge; feminist theory; masculinism; partial knowledges; peer review

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Okanagan University College

Publication date: 01 November 2001

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more