Skip to main content

Beyond Bias? The Promise and Limits of Q Method in Human Geography

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Q method is a quantitative technique for eliciting, evaluating, and comparing human subjectivity. We introduce the method here and evaluate its strengths and weaknesses, especially with regards to its incorporation into human geographic research. We conclude that Q method is particularly appropriate for human geographies informed by anti-essentialist notions of the subject and constructivist accounts of social and natural reality. Claims by the founders of Q method that hold that the procedure distances and removes the bias of the researcher are shown to be unfounded and epistemologically naïve. Nevertheless, Q method is a rigorous, hermeneutic, and iterative technique that allows the researcher to surrender the monopoly of control in their relationship with the researched and so contribute to more democratic research design and implementation.

Keywords: categories; qualitative methodology; quantitative methodology; reflexivity; subjectivity

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00252

Affiliations: 1: Ohio State University, 2: Clark University

Publication date: November 1, 2000

bpl/prog/2000/00000052/00000004/art00005
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more