Skip to main content

JUSTIFYING METAPHYSICAL NIHILISM: A RESPONSE TO CAMERON

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Abstract

Ross Cameron charges the subtraction argument for metaphysical nihilism with equivocation: each premise is plausible only under different interpretations of ‘concrete’. This charge is ungrounded; the argument is both valid and supported by basic modal intuitions.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2008.588.x

Publication date: 2009-01-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more