The Indispensability Argument and Multiple Foundations for Mathematics

Author: Baker, Alan

Source: The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 53, Number 210, January 2003 , pp. 49-67(19)

Buy & download fulltext article:

Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

One recent trend in the philosophy of mathematics has been to approach the central epistemological and metaphysical issues concerning mathematics from the perspective of the applications of mathematics to describing the world, especially within the context of empirical science. A second area of activity is where philosophy of mathematics intersects with foundational issues in mathematics, including debates over the choice of set-theoretic axioms, and over whether category theory, for example, may provide an alternative foundation for mathematics. My central claim is that these latter issues are of direct relevance to philosophical arguments connected to the applicability of mathematics. In particular, the possibility of there being distinct alternative foundations for mathematics blocks the standard argument from the indispensable role of mathematics in science to the existence of specific mathematical objects.

Document Type: Original article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00295

Affiliations: 1: Xavier University, Ohio

Publication date: 2003-01-01