Skip to main content

Bird on Dispositions and Antidotes

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

In The Philosophical Quarterly, 48 (1998), Alexander Bird raises an objection against the conditional analysis of dispositions: where an ‘antidote’ is present all the supposed conditions for manifestation of a disposition are fulfilled but the manifestation does not occur. But Bird’s argument suffers from equivocation. If we spell out properly whether the disposition's conditions are to include the presence of the antidote or not, the apparent counter-examples disappear. So his examples do not undermine the conditional analysis of dispositions; they show merely that we need to be careful about describing the examples consistently.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00181

Affiliations: University of Aarhus

Publication date: April 1, 2000

bpl/phiq/2000/00000050/00000199/art00007
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more