Skip to main content

Singular Term, Subject and Predicate

Buy Article:

$43.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Several writers on the philosophy of language have put forward definitions of a class of English expressions which they call ‘singular terms’. Two kinds of definition have been particularly popular: one which derives from Dummett and one, inspired by Aristotle, which is based on the idea that you can negate a predicable but not a singular term. I argue that the Dummettian definition leads to unacceptable consequences. I suggest, however, that the ‘Aristotelian’ definition is of more use than has sometimes been thought. ‘Negation’ can be understood in two ways: one which is more‘grammatical’ and one which is more ‘logical’. A criterion derived from grammar should be used to recognize which linguistic expressions should count as singular terms, predicables, etc., while a more logic-based criterion should be used to check whether the classification suggested by grammar actually has any logical importance.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: University of Edinburgh

Publication date: 2000-04-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more