On Husserl and Cavellian Scepticism

Author: Stone A.D.1

Source: The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 50, Number 198, January 2000 , pp. 1-21(21)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

In the early parts of The Claim of Reason, Stanley Cavell develops an account of scepticism based on his distinction between specific and generic objects. Because there are no ('Austinian') criteria for generic objects, it seems that we cannot know them; and the sceptic argues that this kind of knowledge is a 'best case', so that failure here indicates the impossibility of knowledge in general. I show that, in Husserl's Ideen I, the transcendental ego is the cause of being of all objects qua generic, or, in other words, that we know generic objects in the manner of an intellectus archetypus. Hence Husserl has a kind of refutation of the Cavellian sceptic, albeit perhaps at a very high price.

Language: English

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Harvard University

The full text article is temporarily unavailable.

We apologise for the inconvenience. Please try again later.

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A