REASONS AND MOTIVATION—NOT A WRONG DISTINCTION
This paper responds to Susan Hurley's attempt to undermine the adequacy of the distinction at the heart of the internalism-externalism debate about reasons for action. The paper shows that Hurley's argument fails and then, more positively, indicates a neat way to characterize the distinction.
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: School of Philosophy University of Leeds Woodhouse Lane Leeds LS2 9JT UK, Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Publication date: May 1, 2006